Cases 1 - 10 of 15
PERRONE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12822
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MICHAEL PERRONE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Michael Perrone, et al v. Johnson & Johnson, et al
as 21-1885
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOM TARANTINO, MICHAEL PERRONE and ROCHELLE ROSEN, as participants in and on behalf of the Johnson & Johnson Savings Plan, and on behalf of a class of all others who are similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, PETER FASOLO and DOMINIC J. CARUSO
Perrone v. Uttecht
as 3:2019cv06190
Petitioner:
David Michael Perrone
Respondent:
Jeffrey A Uttecht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PERRONE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv00923
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PERRONE
Defendant:
PETER FASOLO, DOMINIC J. CARUSO, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05952
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McGrath et al v. City of Somerville
as 1:2017cv10979
Plaintiff:
Michael McGrath , Robert Akenbauer , Michael Ameral and others
Defendant:
City of Somerville
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perron v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2013cv00708
Plaintiff:
Michael Perron
Defendant:
Arizona, State of , Juan Herrera , Unknown Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Sampson v. Ville Platte et al
as 1:2011cv01780
Defendant:
City of Ville Platte, Neal Lartigue, Jennifer Vidrine and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Sampson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sampson v. Ville Platte et al
as 6:2011cv01780
Defendant:
City of Ville Platte, Neal Lartigue, Jennifer Vidrine and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Sampson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Perron et al v. Energy Cranes L L C
as 6:2008cv00105
Plaintiff:
Michael Perron, Michael Perron, Michael Perron and others
Defendant:
Energy Cranes L L C
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 1331 General Maritime/OCSLA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
