Cases 1 - 10 of 138
Cremen v. Tarantino et al
as 1:2023cv00787
Plaintiff:
Michael Cremen
Defendant:
Daniel Tarantino, Aaron Besecher, Michael Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Jones
as 3:2023cv03875
Petitioner:
Michael Phillips and Michael J. Phillips
Respondent:
Acting Warden Gena Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. Earls et al
as 4:2023cv00675
Plaintiff:
Michael Phillips
Defendant:
Earls, Lewis and Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corey Pollard, et al v. Michael Phillips, et al
as 22-3809
Plaintiff:
COREY POLLARD
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OMARI HOWARD PATTON
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL PHILLIPS, Warden, CORECIVIC, and the individual contractors and U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE
Woods v. Health Care Specialty Services et al
as 3:2022cv01055
Plaintiff:
Michael Phillip Woods
Defendant:
Health Care Specialty Services and Centinela State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Singh v. LaPorte County Jail et al
as 3:2022cv00260
Plaintiff:
Michael Phillip Singh and Michael P Singh
Defendant:
LaPorte County Jail, John T Boyd, Al Ott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Singh v. Oss et al
as 3:2021cv00493
Plaintiff:
Michael Phillip Singh
Defendant:
Jamie M Oss, Bethany J Beckman, Lyn M Swanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bartoli v. Phillips
as 4:2021cv01236
Respondent:
Warden Michael Phillips
Petitioner:
Eric Bartoli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Reid et al
as 5:2021ct03155
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson and Robert H. Johnson
Defendant:
Joseph L. Rayfield, Michael Phillips, Captain Wester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Meyer
as 4:2021cv00211
Respondent:
Shannon Meyer
Petitioner:
James Michael Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
