Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Whitaker v. Gatton et al
as 1:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Michael Whitaker
Defendant:
Marcus Gatton and Sean Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITAKER v. GATTON et al
as 1:2022cv00468
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WHITAKER
Defendant:
MARCUS GATTON and SEAN MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stuckey v. Whitaker et al
as 3:2022cv00039
Defendant:
HAJOCA Corporation doing business as Hughes Supply also known as The Plumbing Warehouse also known as LCR-M, Michael Whitaker, The Plumbing Warehouse and others
Plaintiff:
Wish Stuckey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
United States v. Whitaker
as 20-7050
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL WHITAKER, SR., AKA Unc
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
WHITAKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv98819
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WHITAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITAKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv00500
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WHITAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raymond v. Klausner Lumber One, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00287
Defendant:
Christoph Schaetz, Klausner Lumber One, LLC, Klausner Holding USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Raymond, Levon Cherry, Jason Harlow and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2102
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00308
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Hogquist v. State of Minnesota, U.S., The et al
as 0:2019cv02472
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, U.S., the, Kristen C. Larsen, Eric Peterson and others
Plaintiff:
Michelle Lyn Hogquist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitaker v. Dept. of Corrections
as 1:2019cv03916
Plaintiff:
Michael Whitaker
Defendant:
Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
