Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Colon v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv01155
Petitioner:
Adrian Miguel Colon
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shortt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02219
Plaintiff:
Mark Shortt, Rob Hibbitt, Gordon Cooper and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co.), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Shortt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2023cv02808
Plaintiff:
Mark Shortt, Rob Hibbitt, Gordon Cooper and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Colon v. Amazon Logistics, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00363
Plaintiff:
Miguel Colon
Defendant:
Amazon Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612
Colon v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02866
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., CR Bard and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Miguel Colon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv30917
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL COLON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLON v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2018cv05056
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL COLON
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
COLON v. BERRYHILL et al
as 5:2018cv04781
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL COLON
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Orff et al v. City of Imperial et al
as 3:2017cv00116
Plaintiff:
Kali Orff and Michelle Kristol
Defendant:
City of Imperial, Imperial Police Department, Chief Miguel Colon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colon v. YRC Inc
as 3:2016cv01970
Plaintiff:
Miguel Colon
Defendant:
YRC Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
