Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00509
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lucas v. Vogt et al
as 3:2026cv01062
Plaintiff:
George Vaughn Lucas and Geor
Defendant:
LPN A. Vogt, LPN S. Norris, Med Tech A. Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00469
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
United States of America v. Singletary, II. (David Singletary)
as 26-2018
Defendant:
DWIGHT A SINGLETARY, II, MCKENZIE MERRIALICE COLES, NEHEMIAH FANE and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Murtic v. Segal et al
as 3:2026cv01187
Petitioner:
Denis Murtic
Respondent:
Mike Segal, Courtney Rowe and John Does
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Johnson v. Collins et al
as 2:2026cv01589
Plaintiff:
Russel Johnson
Defendant:
Kairon Collins, Terri Perry, PORT AUTHORITY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jordan v. Wren et al
as 4:2026cv00101
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jordan, Jr.
Defendant:
Superintendent Sequeia Wren, Mike Dixon, Commissioner Burl Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
United States of America v. Ebady (Tsikman)
as 26-2011
Defendant:
HAFIZULLAH EBADY, DELA SAIDAZIM, DAVID GARY BISHOFF and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
