Cases 31 - 40 of 113
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv23206
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MIKE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stephen Yagman v. Eric Michael Garcetti et al
as 2:2020cv02722
Plaintiff:
Stephen Yagman
Defendant:
Adel H. Hagekhalil, Mike Davis, Michael N. Feuer and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Davis v. Austin Independent School District
as 1:2020cv00353
Defendant:
Austin Independent School District
Plaintiff:
Mike Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DAVIS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv01139
Plaintiff:
MIKE DAVIS
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rolfes v. Davis et al
as 1:2020cv00686
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilation and Corrections and Mike Davis
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Rolfes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Moyster et al
as 4:2020cv00097
Defendant:
Michael Nelson, Dukes, Mark Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Allen and Derrick Lamont Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Moyster et al
as 4:2020cv00056
Defendant:
Bruce Moyster, Mike Davis, Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Deon A Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David James v. Eric Cheatham, et al
as 20-1175
Defendant / Appellee:
Eric Cheatham, Officer, North Little Rock Police Department and Mike Davis, Chief of Police, North Little Rock Police Department (Originally named as Doe)
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David N. James
Colacino et al v. Davis
as 7:2019cv09648
Plaintiff:
Colacino Industries, Inc. and James Colacino
Defendant:
Mike Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 lm
Heyward et al v. Cooper et al
as 3:2019cv02499
Defendant:
Ibrahim Abdulrahim Al-Hagg, Dr. B. Potts, K. Riehle and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Cooper, Mathew May, Mark White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
