Cases 21 - 30 of 1,711
Thomas v. Pheneger et al
as 3:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Thomas
Defendant:
Pheneger, Burns, Patella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Ballard et al
as 3:2023cv01702
Plaintiff:
LaDyon Jones
Defendant:
Ben Ballard, Lauren Milton and Courtney Chainey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Milton v. Angle, et al
as 23-3245
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MILTON
Defendant:
CLINTON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, WARDEN ANGELA HOOVER, LT. RAUSH and others
Collier v. Burnes
as 23-11255
Plaintiff:
Darron Lashawn Collier
Defendant:
Ty Burnes, Terrell Police Department and James Milton, Terrell Police Department
Adams v. Louisiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01672
Plaintiff:
Corey Marquee Adams
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Corrections, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Tim Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Earquhart v. USA
as 5:2023cv00722
Petitioner:
Xavier Milton Earquhart
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hicks v. Ballard et al
as 3:2023cv01659
Plaintiff:
Colt A. Hicks
Defendant:
Ben Ballard, Courtney Chaney, Jennifer Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zulu v. Ivey et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00695
Plaintiff:
Muzuz Mussun Ali Bamu Zulu and Milton Dudley
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Karen Williams, Elizabeth Laseter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milton v. Valley
as 1:2023cv00520
Petitioner:
Bishop Patrick Michael Milton
Defendant:
Randy Valley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Milton v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2023cv03080
Plaintiff:
Steve Milton
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
