Cases 1 - 10 of 206
Manik v. Garland
as 24-327
Petitioner:
MOHAMMAD MANIK, JANNY BEGUM, MARUF AHMED MAHIM and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States v. Elmer Mims
as 23-3218
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Elmer Mims, also known as Unc
United States v. Derek Mims
as 23-2884
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Derek Michael Mims
Mims-Baptiste et al v. Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association et al
as 2:2023cv03201
Plaintiff:
Paula Mims-Baptiste and Morris Bart L.L.C.
Defendant:
Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association and Standard Mortgage Corporation
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
MIMS v. HASTETTER et al
as 3:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
DR. TIMOTHY MIMS and TIMOTHY MIMS
Defendant:
LISA HASTETTER, INNOVATIVE PRACTICE SOLUTIONS, LLC, MEDICAL BILLING CONSULTANTS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
FCIP, LLC v. INDO-MIM, Inc et al
as 1:2023cv00930
Plaintiff:
FCIP, LLC
Defendant:
INDO-MIM, Inc and Sig Sauer, Inc.
Smith v. Bell et al
as 1:2023cv02091
Plaintiff:
Willie G. Smith
Defendant:
Lucy Jackson Bell, Kisha Corey-Spann and Jacqulyn Mims
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00445
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Copeland et al v. Energizer Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv02087
Plaintiff:
Don Copeland, Joseph Murray, Carol Smith and others
Defendant:
Energizer Holdings, Inc. and Wal-Mart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
USA v. Mims
as 22-11240
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael Robert Mims
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
