Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Bossio v. Robinson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00704
Plaintiff:
Hector Manuel Bossio, Jr.
Defendant:
Colonel Robinson , Captain Dill and Mrs. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEATY v. CARTER et al
as 1:2017cv01568
Plaintiff:
DEREK BEATY
Defendant:
MR. CAPPS, ROBERT CARTER, MRS. MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Livingston et al
as 9:2017cv00040
Plaintiff:
Frederick Carter
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Todd Harris, Mr. Stalinsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawley v. Moore et al
as 2:2016cv00703
Plaintiff:
David Crawley
Defendant:
Mr. Moore, Mayo, Birckhead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. Duncan et al
as 3:2016cv00945
Plaintiff:
James F Webb
Defendant:
Stephen Duncan, Mr Moore, Mrs Treadway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley v. Mr. Moore et al
as 3:2016cv01020
Plaintiff:
James C. Bradley
Defendant:
Mr. Moore, Suwannee CI and Security Departments
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frankie LordMaster v. Mr. Moore, III
as 16-6865
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKIE JAE LORDMASTER, f/k/a Jason Robert Goldader
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. MOORE, Sussex 2 Chaplain, A. D. ROBINSON, Chief Correctional Operations, JAMES, Institutional Ombudsman/Grievance Coordinator and others
Bradley v. Security Officer Mr. Moore et al
as 3:2016cv00868
Plaintiff:
James Clifton Bradley
Defendant:
Security Officer Mr. Moore and Suwannee Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Hughs (INMATE 2)
as 1:2016cv00297
Plaintiff:
Steven Paul Morris
Defendant:
Mrs. Hughs , Capt. Reed , Mrs. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dantzler v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv04662
Plaintiff:
Oscar Lee Dantzler
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Ms Jamison, Warden Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
