Cases 51 - 60 of 77
Nathaniel Singleton v. Mr. Nelson
as 14-7139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL SINGLETON
Defendant - Appellee:
FOOD SERVICE OFFICER MR. NELSON, FOOD SERVICE MR. TAYLOR, FOOD SERVICE MR. CRAZE and others
Welton v. United States of America et al
as 1:2014cv13141
Plaintiff:
Byron Jermaine Welton
Defendant:
United States of America, James Jarret, Mr. Padula and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Majette et al
as 2:2014cv00098
Plaintiff:
Leonard Bell
Defendant:
Offender Majette, F. Best and Mrs. Taylor
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Nathaniel Singleton v. Mr. Nelson
as 14-6103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL SINGLETON
Defendant - Appellee:
FOOD SERVICE OFFICER MR. NELSON, FOOD SERVICE MR. TAYLOR, FOOD SERVICE MR. CRAZE and others
Lynn v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv04735
Plaintiff:
Sean Carey Lynn
Defendant:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID, Mr. Summers, Ms. Angie Ricks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. Lane et al
as 3:2013cv00814
Plaintiff:
Arthur G Boyd
Defendant:
David Lane, Garriup Construction, Skillman Construction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Hatchett et al
as 2:2013cv00002
Plaintiff:
Robert Taylor Austin
Defendant:
Ms. Hatchett, Mr. Jones, Mr. Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fabbri v. Johnson et al
as 1:2012cv00891
Plaintiff:
Anthony Fabbri
Defendant:
Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Ming and Mrs. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rivera v. Detroit Public Schools et al
as 2:2012cv13394
Defendant:
Detroit Public Schools , Robert Bobb , kenyetta wilbourn and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. The Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv01131
Plaintiff:
Alfred Simmons
Defendant:
The Department of Corrections and C.O. Mrs. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
