Cases 1 - 10 of 77
3 N HOLDING CORPORATION v. LUKOIL NORTH AMERICAN LLC
as 3:2024cv05102
Plaintiff:
3 N HOLDING CORPORATION
Defendant:
LUKOIL NORTH AMERICAN LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2801 Petroleum Marketing Practices Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
N/S Corporation v. Westmatic Corporation
as 2:2023cv05241
Plaintiff:
N/S Corporation
Defendant:
Westmatic Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
N/S Corporation v. Westmatic Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv05245
Plaintiff:
N/S Corporation
Defendant:
Westmatic Corporation and Does 1 through 50, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Franklin Smith v. Cpl. D. Beavers
as 22-6518
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
CPL D. N. BEAVERS, Corporal, CPL. UZZLE, Corporal/Intel, D. A. TAYLOR, Deputy/Intel and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Eiman v. N/S Corporation
as 1:2021cv00366
Plaintiff:
Charles J. Eiman and Charles J. Eiman doing business as Action Plumbing
Defendant:
N/S Corporation, Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wobser v. Ventra Sandusky, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv02796
Defendant:
Flex-N-Gate Corporation and Ventra Sandusky, LLC
Plaintiff:
Wendy Wobser
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
