Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Z.D. et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2023cv00943
Plaintiff:
Z. D., A. B., R. A. and others
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, US Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
N.E. v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2021cv00684
Plaintiff:
N. E.
Defendant:
BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NORTH CAROLINA and Carson Dellosa Publishing, LLC Welfare Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Stephens v. N&E Plumbing, LLC et al
as 8:2020cv02321
Defendant:
N&E Plumbing, LLC and Julio Henriquez Sandoval
Plaintiff:
Margaret Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00391
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Gordon et al
as 2:2018cv01243
Defendant:
N. E. G., A. R. G. and Jessica D. Gordon
Plaintiff:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Merle Rutledge, Jr. v. City of Norfolk, Virginia
as 09-1898
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MERLE T. RUTLEDGE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF NORFOLK, VIRGINIA, CITY OF NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT and N. E. KARANGELEN, Officer
Chetanand Sewraz v. David Long, Jr.
as 09-6540
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHETANAND KUMAR SEWRAZ
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID LONG, JR., MICHAEL MORCHOWER, ETHICAL INVESTIGATIONS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Podhorn v. Angelini et al
as 3:2007cv00416
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Podhorn, Jr.
Defendant:
Chris Angelini, Scott Finley, B. True and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
