Cases 1 - 10 of 101
Iesha Mitchell, et al v. City of Benton Harbor, MI, et al
as 23-1970
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IESHA MITCHELL, Guardian and next friend of A.M., KEA N. BENNETT, Guardian and next friend of A.B. next friend of S.B., et al., CHRISTINE ANDERSON, Guardian and next friend of A.L.next friend of D.L. 1 next friend of D.L. 2 next friend of M.L. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF BENTON HARBOR, MI, MARCUS MUHAMMAD, MICHAEL O'MALLEY and others
Miller v. Biden et al
as 2:2023cv02014
Plaintiff:
Sylvia N Miller
Defendant:
United States Attorney's Office, United States Attorney General, Joe Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Derrick MillerIn re: Derrick Miller
as 23-12405
Petitioner:
In re: DERRICK N. MILLER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SALEEM v. METZ et al
as 2:2023cv01128
Plaintiff:
NASIR SALEEM
Defendant:
K. METZ, SMITH, SCI GREENE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00716
Plaintiff:
Christina N Miller
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Derrick N. MillerIn re: Derrick N. Miller
as 23-10592
Petitioner:
In re: DERRICK N. MILLER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STEFAN DIAZ ESPINOSA, PAUL C. HUCK and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
In re: Derrick Miller
as 23-10044
Petitioner:
In re: DERRICK N. MILLER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STEFAN DIAZ ESPINOSA and PAUL C. HUCK
USA v. Derrick Miller
as 22-13611
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DERRICK N. MILLER
In re: Derrick Miller
as 22-13194
Petitioner:
In re: DERRICK N. MILLER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STEFAN DIAZ ESPINOSA and PAUL C. HUCK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
