Cases 51 - 60 of 223
Wilson v. Houston-NASA et al
as 5:2021cv00975
Plaintiff:
Sidney Wilson
Defendant:
Houston-NASA, John Doe and Police Affiliates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ainsley v. United States Air Force, et al
as 1:2021cv01795
Plaintiff:
Absynth Ainsley
Defendant:
United States Air Force, NASA, Targeted Individual Program and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Frazier v. NASA
as 2:2021cv00529
Plaintiff:
Melvin Frazier, Jr.
Defendant:
NASA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilson v. Houston-Nasa et al
as 5:2021cv00117
Plaintiff:
Sidney Wilson
Defendant:
Houston-Nasa, John Doe and Police Affiliates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
72 Partners, LLC v. Joseph D. Gilberti
as 8:2021cv01952
Plaintiff:
72 Partners, LLC and Joseph D. Gilberti, Jr.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Intelligence, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Gonye v. California Department of Motor Vehicles et al
as 5:2021cv05223
Plaintiff:
Stephanie A Gonye
Defendant:
California Department of Motor Vehicles and Nasa Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv01644
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shahem v. C.I.A. et al
as 1:2021cv03374
Defendant:
C.I.A., Pentagon, NASA and others
Plaintiff:
Khalil Shahem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivers v. National Aeronautics and Space Administration ("NASA")
as 1:2021cv11026
Defendant:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration ("NASA")
Plaintiff:
Henry Ivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Peter Alden v. AECOM Technology Corporation, et al
as 21-16002
Defendant / Appellee:
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION, NASA, a Federal Agency
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER ANGELO ALDEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
