Cases 11 - 20 of 915
Harris v. Ganim et al
as 3:2024cv00078
Petitioner:
Gerard Vondrake Harris
Respondent:
Joe Ganim, Michael C. Jankovsky, Roderick Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Fisher v. Columbus et al
as 2:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Sally Fisher
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Andrew Ginther, Ned Pettus, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jones v. McCormack
as 24-54
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAFAEL ARDEN JONES
Respondent / Appellee:
NED MCCORMACK
Clark v. State of Connecticut
as 23-8105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GORDON CLARK, -, in his individual capacity, in his capacities as husband, sole fiduciary, sole beneficiary, and sole creditor of the Estate of Lillian J. Clark
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CONNECTICUT, Office of Governor NED LAMONT, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Bland v. Swanson Services Corporation, et al
as 6:2023cv02466
Plaintiff:
Ned Gerome Bland, Jr.
Defendant:
Swanson Services Corporation, Rick Wells and Trinity Services Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilardy v. Beyond Meat, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01415
Plaintiff:
Ryan Gilardy
Defendant:
Ethan Brown, Mark J. Nelson, Phillip E. Hardin and others
Nominal Defendant:
Beyond Meat, Inc.
Armour v. Lamont
as 3:2023cv01606
Plaintiff:
Shaquan L Armour
Defendant:
Ned Lamont
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moon v. Bramlett et al
as 4:2023cv01560
Plaintiff:
Darnell Wesly Moon
Defendant:
Kim Bramlett, Lynn Lyons, Ned Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Moon v. Macke et al
as 4:2023cv01563
Plaintiff:
Darnell Moon and Darnell W. Moon
Defendant:
Daniel Macke, Kim Bramlett, Charles Doerge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Monroe v. Lamont et al
as 3:2023cv01584
Plaintiff:
Timothy C. Monroe
Defendant:
Ned Lamont and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
