Cases 41 - 50 of 469
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Davis v. Marthakis et al
as 3:2022cv00420
Plaintiff:
Arnell D Davis, Jr
Defendant:
Marthakis, Lott and Ron Neel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godhigh v. Rogers et al
as 3:2022cv00474
Plaintiff:
Mario Godhigh
Defendant:
W. Rogers, A. McGregor and C. Neel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shannon v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2022cv00484
Plaintiff:
Corey Shannon
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Neel Eaton, Rhonda Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neels v. Young et al
as 4:2022cv04053
Petitioner:
Ronald Lee Neels
Respondent:
Darin Young, Bob Dooley, Brenda Hyde and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HAMZE v. SETTLEMYERS et al
as 3:2022cv04978
Plaintiff:
ABDELAZIZ HAMZE
Defendant:
SETTLEMYERS, KOSANOVICH, SIMMONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BELL v. JACOBSEN et al
as 3:2022cv04701
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALLEN BELL
Defendant:
JACOBSEN, JOHN DOE 1, NEEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardin v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00332
Plaintiff:
Joshua Neel Hardin
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Gloria Waldon, McGraw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardy v. River North Correctional Center et al
as 7:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Vincent A. Hardy, Jr.
Defendant:
River North Correctional Center, Stoyer, Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
M.C. et al v. Girardeau et al
as 1:2022cv00464
Plaintiff:
M. C., Tim Cali, Kristen Cali and others
Defendant:
Susan L Girardeau, Sharon Boyer, Dana Neel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
