Cases 1 - 10 of 36
ANDERSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09288
Plaintiff:
NICHLAS ANDERSON and NICHOLAS ANDERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
J. W. 1 et al v. City of Glendale et al
as 2:2023cv03006
Plaintiff:
J. W. 1 and J. W. 2
Defendant:
City of Glendale, Nicholas Anderson, Francisco Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Anderson et al
as 2:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Vincent D Williams
Defendant:
Nicholas Anderson, Walker and Brent Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bligh v. Ruden et al
as 0:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Amy Julia Bligh
Defendant:
Andrew Ruden and Nicholas Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COULTER v. COULTER et al
as 2:2022cv01806
Plaintiff:
JEAN COULTER
Defendant:
JAMES P. COULTER, SUSAN VERO COULTER, KAREN VERO MORROW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Carswell v. Anderson, et al.
as 1:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
Jack Christopher Carswell
Defendant:
Nicholas Anderson, Terry Hodges, Nathan Atkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ANDERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv37979
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS ANDERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clay v. Rodriguez et al
as 4:2021cv04082
Defendant:
Sgt. Nicholas Rodriguez, Officer Nicholas Anderson, Officer Brent McDonald and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Michael Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv21046
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS ANDERSON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
