Cases 1 - 10 of 2,395
NORRIS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00341
Petitioner:
JONATHAN MORRISON NORRIS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
McCoy v. Moore
as 3:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Norris R. McCoy
Defendant:
Officer Ronisha Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. CoreCivic et al
as 3:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Joseph Norris
Defendant:
CoreCivic and Lorina Poe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Gagliano et al
as 1:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Jabari J Johnson
Defendant:
Stephanie Gagliano, Leon Johnson and FNU Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Fleming v. Wayne County, MI, et al
as 24-1215
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DELON FLEMING
Defendant:
WAYNE COUNTY, MI, BENNY N. NAPOLEON, MICHAEL KNAUS, 1st Shift Sgt. and others
Sudberry v. Stuff et al.
as 3:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
James D. Rome Sudberry
Defendant:
Warden Stuff, Booth, Roberson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Armajo v. State of Wyoming et al
as 1:2024cv00061
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Warden, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Mail Room Supervisor, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Mail Room Supervisor and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Alfred Armajo, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Borders v. Gomez et al
as 1:2024cv02070
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Borders
Defendant:
David Gomez, LT. Norris, LT. Krewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williamson v. Wyoming Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-8015
Petitioner:
BRAEDEN WILLIAMSON
Respondent:
WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS MEDIUM CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION WARDEN, AKA Seth Norris and WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Norris Pegues v. Karl Hoffman, et al
as 24-1366
Plaintiff:
NORRIS E. PEGUES
Defendant:
KARL HOFFMAN, Doctor, LYNN DOBBERT and CANDACE WARNER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
