Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Donald Parker v. Nurse C. Boyd
as 24-6201
Plaintiff:
DONALD PARKER
Defendant:
NURSE C. BOYD, NURSE R. MENESES and HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL JAIL
Parker v. Boyd et al
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Donald Parker
Defendant:
Nurse C. Boyd, Mr. R. Meneses and Hampton Roads Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCUNE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
THOMAS W MCCUNE and THOMAS W. MCCUNE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LAUREL HARRY, PAUL NOEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Eric Morrison v. C. Meyer
as 23-6223
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC WILFORD MORRISON
Defendant / Appellee:
LSCI-BUTNER, NURSE C. MEYER and TAMARA S. LYN
Parker v. Boyd, et al.
as 3:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Donald Parker
Defendant:
Nurse C. Boyd, Mr. R. Meneses and Hampton Roads Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. McCoy et al
as 7:2022cv00641
Plaintiff:
Corey J. Jones
Defendant:
McCoy, B. Hurley, Unknown K-9 Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joyner v. Hardee et al
as 5:2022ct03335
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel L. Joyner and Nathaniel Lee Joyner
Defendant:
Warden Hardee, Mr. Saul, Lead Nurse C. Mad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindsey v. Callas et al
as 3:2022cv03041
Plaintiff:
William Christopher Lindsey
Defendant:
Lieutenant Callas and Nurse C
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dobbins v. McClain et al
as 3:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
Virgil Dobbins, III
Defendant:
Matt McClain, Laura Cleveland and Does "Nurse C.", Turn Key Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley v. Danforth et al
as 5:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Alvin Gamar Stanley
Defendant:
Warden Danforth, Warden Ricky Stone, Chief Malcom Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
