Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Love v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Richard Love
Defendant:
United States of America a governmental entity doing business as United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
COLWELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv33994
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL RICHARD COLWELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RICHARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv24201
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL RICHARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hull v. Rockwell
as 19-2074
Appellant:
NATHANIEL RICHARD HULL, Chapter 7 Trustee and NATHANIEL RICHARD HULL
Appellee:
JEFFREY J. ROCKWELL, d/b/a Rockwell Productions, f/d/b/a Rockwell Productions Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00385
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Richards v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv05589
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Richards
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Richard v. Fitspatrick et al
as 6:2012cv00562
Defendant:
Eugene Police Department and Sargent Fitspatrick
Plaintiff:
Darrell Nathaniel Richard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richard v. University of Oregon Department of Public Safety
as 6:2012cv00321
Plaintiff:
Darrell Nathaniel Richard
Defendant:
University of Oregon Department of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richard v. Exposed Newspaper Company
as 6:2012cv00300
Defendant:
Exposed Newspaper Company
Plaintiff:
Darrell Nathaniel Richard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Richards v. Louisiana et al
as 2:2011cv01206
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, Sheriffs Calcasieu, Dept of Justice and others
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Richards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
