Cases 11 - 20 of 97
Schuh et al v. Burgum et al
as 1:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Ricky R. Schuh and Adam S. Hamilton
Defendant:
Governor Doug Burgum, Dave Krabbenhoft, James Sayler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odem v. Hutchinson et al
as 4:2021cv00948
Plaintiff:
Jack Odem, III
Defendant:
Asa Hutchinson, Leslie Ruthledge, Nathaniel Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Westerman v. Hutchinson et al
as 4:2021cv00949
Plaintiff:
Marion Westerman
Defendant:
Asa Hutchinson, Leslie Ruthledge, Nathaniel Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv41362
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Illinois Central Railroad Company
as 2:2021cv01235
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Smith
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
JORGE v. MUNOZ et al
as 2:2021cv00369
Defendant:
MS. ZACK, NATHANIEL SMITH, KAREN FRAGILE and others
Plaintiff:
LUIS JORGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv10217
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Fowler, et al v. J. Paul, et al
as 20-3092
Defendant / Appellee:
Nathaniel Smith, Secretary of Health, Asa Hutchinson, Governor of Arkansas, J. Terry Paul and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Fowler and Virginia Fowler
WILLIAMS v. SMITH
as 5:2020cv00342
Plaintiff:
QUENTONIO WILLIAMS
Defendant:
NATHANIEL SMITH, JR and OFFICER TALER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fowler et al v. Paul et al
as 3:2020cv03042
Defendant:
Nathaniel Smith, J. Terry Paul, Asa Hutchinson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Fowler and Virginia L. Fowler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
