Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Nathaniel Thompson v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv00246
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USA v. Thompson
as 22-40421
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Ralph Nathaniel Thompson
Thompson v. Collin County Sheriff's Office
as 4:2021cv00875
Petitioner:
John Nathaniel Thompson
Respondent:
Collin County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv34088
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL THOMPSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. USA
as 4:2021cv00401
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ralph Nathaniel Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cephas-Hill v. Linden Medical Center/Mid-Ohio Family Practice Associates et al
as 2:2020cv04281
Defendant:
WEST BROAD FAMILY HEALTH CARE CENTER, LINDEN MEDICAL CENTER/MID-OHIO FAMILY PRACTICE ASSOCIATES and NATHANIEL THOMPSON
Plaintiff:
Kelly Cephas-Hill
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv27944
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
thompson v. mccullick
as 2:2019cv11510
Petitioner:
allen nathaniel thompson
Respondent:
Warden mark mccullick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Tompkins County Jail et al
as 9:2016cv01303
Plaintiff:
Rashid Ali Brown
Defendant:
Tompkins County Jail, Sheriff Lansing, Nathaniel Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathaniel Thompson v. U.S. Bank National Association
as 15-1767
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
