Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,502
USA v. Maxwell
as 24-10255
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Gregory Neil Maxwell
Parrish, Christopher Neil v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv14085
Plaintiff: Christopher Neil Parrish
Defendant: Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Maxwell
as 24-10247
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Gregory Neil Maxwell
Foster v. Neil et al
as 5:2024cv00401
Plaintiff: Jeremy Dewayne Foster
Defendant: Lonnie Neil, Roderick Malcolm, Curtis Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banner, Antonio L. v. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv14080
Plaintiff: Antonio Leon Banner
Defendant: Tim Jones, Neil Lettman and Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Wainwright v. Dodge
as 0:2024cv60401
Plaintiff: Edward Wainwright
Defendant: Neil Dodge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Tavron v. Payne et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff: Marques Tavron
Defendant: Dexter Payne, Mose Jackson, III, M Richarson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberson v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00241
Petitioner: Neil James Roberson
Respondent: Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sawyer et al v. Deschutes County et al
as 6:2024cv00267
Plaintiff: Kent Sawyer and Sandra Lynn Short
Defendant: Deschutes County, L. Shane Nelson, Michael Schults and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Thoresons et al
as 2:2024cv00164
Plaintiff: Trivon Devele Wilson
Defendant: Department of Corrections, Division of Adult Institutions, Milwaukee House of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?