Cases 41 - 50 of 69
USA v. Joseph Newbill
as 13-30365
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSEPH NEWBILL
NEWBILL et al v. WALGREEN CO. et al
as 1:2013cv07479
Plaintiff:
DESMOND NEWBILL , SHAWNA BOYCE and MARY BURTON NEWBILL
Defendant:
WALGREEN CO., CHERRY HILL TOWNSHIP, CHERRY HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hutcherson v. Moore et al
as 1:2013cv01318
Plaintiff:
Rene R Hutcherson
Defendant:
Agnes A Moore , Martha L Newbill and Commodity Credit Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
Allen Poston v. Director Kane
as 13-7805
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLEN WAYNE POSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
KANE, Director, TRACY JONES, Warden, ERIC WILSON, Warden and others
Poston v. Kane et al
as 1:2013cv00365
Plaintiff:
Allen Wayne Poston
Defendant:
Kane, Tracy Jones, Eric Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newbill v. Cottingham et al
as 0:2012cv01987
Plaintiff:
James Lavance Newbill
Defendant:
Paul Cottingham , Craig Rhode , John Does 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ronald Anderson et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv05037
Plaintiff:
Ralph Acle, Joseph L. Adams, Justine T. Alacar and others
Defendant:
Does and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-311
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bank of New York Mellon v. Matsumoto
as 2:2011cv01828
Cross Defendant:
BAC Home Loan Servicing LP, Bank Of New York, CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2006-3 and others
Plaintiff:
Bank of New York Mellon
Cross Claimant:
Evelyn Matsumoto and Keishi Matsumoto
Defendant:
Keishi Matsumoto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv06397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
