Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Washington v. Saul
as 5:2021cv00047
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Nicole Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Tharpe et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2020cv06033
Plaintiff:
William L. Pokryfke, Tony D. Woods, Karin Jeffress and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
GM Reality Inc. v. Washington
as 4:2019cv03209
Defendant:
Nicole Washington
Plaintiff:
GM Reality Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Thomas v. Gerdes
as 19-1702
Defendant / Appellee:
Pete Baldwin, A.U.S.A., Andrey Spektor, A.U.S.A., Matthew Tine, Special Agent and others
Defendant:
Marisa Seifan, A.U.S.A., Brian Cotter, Alicia Nicole Washington, A.U.S.A. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bernard Thomas
Thomas v. Gerdes et al
as 1:2018cv02749
Defendant:
Alicia Nicole Washington, Marisa M. Seifan, Matthew Tine and others
Plaintiff:
Bernard Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WASHINGTON et al v. VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER
as 1:2016cv02316
Plaintiff:
RAQUEL NICOLE WASHINGTON and AGATHA WASHINGTON
Defendant:
VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Caractor et al v. Housing Bridge 93rd Avenue Family Residence et al
as 2:2013cv03800
Plaintiff:
Bishop William B. Caractor and Reverend Helen Clay-Caractor
Defendant:
Ms. S. Evans, Mr. Noel Francis, Housing Bridge 93rd Avenue Family Residence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington et al v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad
as 1:2009cv09804
Plaintiff:
Gregory Washington and Nicole Washington
Defendant:
Metro-North Commuter Railroad
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
