Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Noble Ali v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 26-2894
Plaintiff:
NOBLE DREW ALI
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, PHILADELPHIA CITY COMMISSIONERS and others
Swami Family Trust Dated February 22, 2024 et al v. Mathow et al
as 6:2026cv01610
Plaintiff:
Swami Family Trust Dated February 22, 2024, Ravi Patel, 1070 Hospitality Inc and others
Defendant:
Sandeep Mathow, Kismet Business Trust LLC, Kismet Family Holdings LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0022 Securities Fraud
Stockett v. Bell
as 1:2026cv02892
Plaintiff:
Adrian Noble Stockett
Defendant:
Misty Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. NC Dept. of Public Safety et al
as 5:2026ct03218
Plaintiff:
Offie C. Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
NC Dept. of Public Safety and Sgt. Nobles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv01965
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Andre Lanier v. TJ Martin
as 26-3651
Petitioner:
ANDRE LANIER
Respondent:
WARDEN TJ MARTIN, Noble Correctional Institution
Near Field Electronics LLC v. Barnes & Noble Booksellers, Inc.
as 4:2026cv00871
Plaintiff:
Near Field Electronics LLC
Defendant:
Barnes & Noble Booksellers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Montero v. Noble et al
as 1:2026cv01993
Plaintiff:
Onecimo Javier Montero
Defendant:
Scott Noble and Howard Hurd doing business as Hurd Transport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05480
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.