Cases 1 - 10 of 1,098
Spell v. County of Jeff Davis, Georgia et al
as 2:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Spell
Defendant:
County of Jeff Davis, Georgia, Preston Bohannon and Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. County of Shasta, et al.
as 24-3019
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. COLEMAN, IV
Defendant:
COUNTY OF SHASTA, a Municipal Corporation, SHASTA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, TIM ESTES, a Shasta County Sheriff Deputy and others
Prescott (PS) v. Horton et al
as 4:2024cv00829
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Billy E. Horton, Marjorie Kovacevich, Emily J. Mielsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prescott (PS) v. Horton et al
as 6:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Billy E. Horton, Marjorie Kovacevich, Emily J. Mielsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loper et al v. Lukis et al
as 1:2024cv20604
Plaintiff:
Council President ELIZABETH A LOPER, Alderman KEITH J BLACK, Alderman KATHLEEN M GROSS and others
Defendant:
Commissioner PATRICIA PETRONE, Ashley Lukis, Michelle Anchors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nunn v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01130
Plaintiff:
Alexander W Nunn
Defendant:
CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC. and COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC
Interested Party:
KENNETH HASSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dixon Jr. et al v. Lammert et al
as 1:2024cv02891
Plaintiff:
Temmy L. Dixon Jr., Cirsten M. Nunn and The City of Chicago
Defendant:
Timothy M. Lammert and Daniel P. Condreva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Radford v. Byers et al
as 4:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Tommy Radford
Defendant:
Jared Byers, J Nunn, Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunn v. Special Public Defenders Office
as 3:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Noel Nunn
Defendant:
Special Public Defenders Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
