Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Pollard v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2026cv00330
Plaintiff:
Shane Dareon Pollard
Defendant:
Warden Israel Hamilton, Assistant Warden Amee Duncan, Charles Dye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. Officer Ball et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. Case is consolidated under 3:26-cv-37.
as 3:2026cv00038
Plaintiff:
Anthony J Ross, Sr.
Defendant:
Officer Ball and City of Galveston, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ross v. Officer Ball et al
as 3:2026cv00037
Plaintiff:
Anthony J Ross, Sr.
Defendant:
Officer Ball and City of Galveston, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooney v. McJunkins et al
as 5:2025cv05013
Plaintiff:
Robert Cooney
Defendant:
Officer McJunkins and Officer Ball
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Rodrigues v. Lieutenant C. Hamilton
as 21-6278
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT BOWLES, OFFICER SMALLWOOD, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER C. LAWSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN RODRIGUES
Rodrigues v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2020cv00338
Defendant:
Correctional Officer T. Brooks, Correctional Officer Bradburn, Correctional Officer C. Lawson and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Rodrigues
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thompson v. Tryon et al
as 6:2017cv06402
Plaintiff:
Nyran Dale Thompson
Defendant:
Todd Tryon, Loretta Lynch, Jeh Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankin Bey v. Pittman et al
as 5:2015ct03182
Plaintiff:
Napoleon J. Rankin Bey
Defendant:
Capt. Pittman, Officer Ball, Officer Burleson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lepley v. LeGrand et al
as 3:2011cv00781
Defendant:
Mr. Baker, Officer Ball, Wayne Baze and others
Plaintiff:
Brian E. Lepley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowe v. Clark
as 3:2004cv00681
Plaintiff:
Walter Kelly Rowe
Defendant:
Jake Clark , Vickie L. Green, Corporal Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
