Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Jeremy Defour v. Lieutenant Webber
as 23-7010
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY PAUL DEFOUR
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT WEBBER, OFFICER BEATY, a/k/a Officer Bates, INTELLIGENCE OFFICER ROSSON and others
Charlie Hardin v. Superintendent Roach
as 23-6973
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLIE L. HARDIN
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ROACH, SUPERINTENDENT ALBRIGHT, SUPERINTENDENT CROWE and others
Hardy v. Call et al
as 2:2023cv00471
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Hardy
Defendant:
Lieutenant Call, Officer Wilmouth and Officer Bates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Kingsport Tennessee Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Dustin E Rice and Dustin Rice
Defendant:
Kingsport Police Department, Riley Eaton-Dye, Officer Addington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hardin v. Roach et al
as 5:2023ct03070
Plaintiff:
Charlie L. Hardin
Defendant:
Officer Roach, Superintendent Albright, Superintendent Crowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlos Garcia v. James Bowles
as 22-7234
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS ALBERTO GARCIA
Defendant / Appellee:
LT. JAMES BOWLES, LT. LIVELY, ACTIVE CAPTAIN, at that time and others
DeFour v. Webber et al
as 7:2022cv00379
Plaintiff:
Jeremy DeFour
Defendant:
Webber, Bates, Woodson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Mueller et al
as 5:2021cv01523
Defendant:
Officer Brantley, Officer Medley, Officer Gillepsie and others
Plaintiff:
Derrik Lemar Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCall v. Pressly (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00230
Plaintiff:
Akevious Damorris McCall
Defendant:
Officer Bates, Elmore Correctional Facility and Sgt. Pressly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melvin v. Gilbert et al
as 7:2020cv00678
Defendant:
Officer Bates and Officer Gilbert
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Devon Melvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
