Cases
STOKES v. RICHARDSON et al
as 1:2023cv00160
Plaintiff: PATRICK STOKES
Defendant: CPT RICHARDSON, LT ADAMS, SGT PRICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. WWW2.police.city/gate et al
as 3:2022cv01598
Plaintiff: Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant: WWW2.police.city/gate, City of -Gate, Park Circle Neighborhood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Office of the Chief of Police - gate et al
as 3:2022cv01455
Plaintiff: SIC, Steven Willis and Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant: Office of the Chief of Police - gate, ANZI Det. Craig Gault, Office of the Multnomah County District Attorney - gate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. ANZI INF. et al
as 3:2022cv01457
Plaintiff: His Sovereignty Steven I Willis, Steven Willis and Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant: ANZI INF., Yolanda Willis, Tigard Police - gate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Randolph et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00507
Plaintiff: Ryon Russell
Defendant: Sergeant Randolph, Correctional Officer Williams, Correctional Officer Mims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. Patchen
as 20-2305
Plaintiff / Appellant: Houston Douglas
Defendant / Appellee: Officer O'Hara, Officer Fiddett, Sergeant Patchen and others
Defendant: I.G.R.C. Supervisor Oniel, in their Official and Individual Capacity and, Anthony Waters and Five Points Correctional Facility
Washington v. Garcia et al
as 4:2012cv02122
Plaintiff: Lorenzo Darnell Washington
Defendant: Adrian Garcia, Officer Gates, Harris County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOON v. LOCKETT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00771
Defendant: OFFICER BASINGER, J. BEIGHLEY, OFFICER BETTS and others
Plaintiff: DARNELL WESLEY MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?