Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Headley et al v. State of Missouri et al
as 2:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Ginger Headley and Mark Coffelt
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Anna Precythe, Janet Eddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. City of Akron, et al
as 5:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Mr. Charles Hicks and Charles Hicks
Defendant:
City of Akron, Acting Chief Michael Caprez, Officer John Turnure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murphy v. Davenport et al
as 4:2020cv04026
Defendant:
Parole Officer Vincent Gamble, Parole Officer Jesse Davis, Parole Officer Heath James Ross and others
Plaintiff:
Brady A. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allgood v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv21366
Defendant:
Officer Sanchez, Officer Flores, Florida Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dean Allgood, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of John David Dellinger v. Bryant et al
as 1:2019cv00044
Defendant:
Sergeant Timothy Combs, Corporal Whitaker, Officer Gordon and others
Plaintiff:
John David Dellinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Cooper et al
as 6:2018cv03264
Defendant:
Officer Melton, Officer Gibson, Officer Burdette and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth M Jordan and Kenneth Morice Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Martin v. Montgomery County Police
as 15-2140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD MARTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CORPORAL FRANK CORN, POLICE OFFICER MATT LYNCH and others
Donovan Rolston v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2013cv01085
Defendant:
Heath Adams, Officer Heath Adams, Charlie Beck and others
Plaintiff:
Donovan Rolston
Igartua v. Officer Sabio et al
as 1:2009cv04134
Plaintiff:
Edna Igartua
Defendant:
Officer Sabio, Officer Clarke, Officer Heath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
