Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Brown v. City of Dallas et al
as 3:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Douglas Deon Brown
Defendant:
City of Dallas, Eddie Garcia, Officer Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loftis v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2022cv01261
Plaintiff:
Natasha Loftis
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Colette Peters, Paula Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Lippiccolo #6863 et al
as 2:2022cv00324
Plaintiff:
Lavon D. Dawson
Defendant:
Anthony Lippiccolo #6863, D.A. Melissa Turk, Suffolk County 6th Precicicnt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yatenga v. Brantel et al
as 2:2021cv05367
Plaintiff:
Mosheh Yatenga
Defendant:
LT Brantel, Officer Ryan Householder, Officer Parrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Smith, et al.
as 1:2019cv00182
Defendant:
Officer Foster, Sgt. Absent, Lt. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph C. Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pennix v. Clarke et al
as 7:2019cv00051
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Sergeant Dean, Officer Lyons and others
Plaintiff:
Jodie Shawntale Pennix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corey Hines v. Lieutenant Clark, et al
as 17-1140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY LOUIS HINES
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT CLARK, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BOOKER, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LYONS and others
Sephus v. Doctor Davenport et al
as 4:2016cv03157
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Ray Sephus
Defendant:
Doctor Davenport, Officer Lyons, Officer Pete Raern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cornelius Sephus v. Sam Goggans, et al
as 16-20176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CORNELIUS RAY SEPHUS
Defendant - Appellee:
SAM GOGGANS, PETE RHAEHN, RUSS RAY and others
Craig Armstrong v. Villa Park Police Department, et al
as 15-1533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG ARMSTRONG
Defendant - Appellee:
VILLA PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES KRUPICZOWICZ, #355 Officer, Villa Park Police, SHARON JELINEK, Officer, Villa Park Police and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
