Cases 71 - 80 of 126
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-6557
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2016cv06744
Plaintiff:
Sam Percival Stewart
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco , San Francisco Police Department, Officer Thomas E. Mora and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Ross et al
as 5:2016ct03185
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Heather Ross, Officer Miller, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Venner v. New York City et al
as 1:2016cv05634
Plaintiff:
Patricia Venner
Defendant:
New York City, Officer Miller and Officer Vahagn Krmoyan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodriguez v. New York City et al
as 1:2016cv05497
Plaintiff:
Ralph Rodriguez
Defendant:
New York City, AMKC Mail Room, M. Mingo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madden v. Jones et al
as 2:2016cv00346
Plaintiff:
Keon Madden
Defendant:
LT. Jones, Adcock, Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madden v. Franzen et al
as 2:2016cv00297
Plaintiff:
Keon Jamall Madden
Defendant:
Franzen, Knewgen, Barbara Meade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNair v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2016cv00871
Defendant:
Armstrong, J. Bell, Sergeant Benitez and others
Plaintiff:
Minister Timothy Luther McNair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Faircloth v. Timme, et al
as 16-1170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES FAIRCLOTH
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN RAE TIMME, in her official and individual capacity, GARY MORGAN, Mental Health Clinician/Designee, in his official and individual capacity, BERNES, Chief Mental Health Clinician/Designee, in her official and individual capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
