Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Smart v. Hawkins et al
as 5:2024ct03100
Plaintiff:
Michael Trevor Smart
Defendant:
S. Hawkins, Associate Warden Bennett, Sergeant Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doyle v. Draper et al
as 7:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
David Blane Doyle
Defendant:
Sheriff Steve Draper, 1st Lt. Law, Capt. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saquan Musgrove v. Correctional Officer Moore
as 22-7430
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAQUAN S. MUSGROVE
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MOORE and OFFICER A. JONES
McDougal v. Spalding et al
as 2:2022cv00558
Plaintiff:
Damien McDougal
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Spalding, Correctional Officer Moore and Correctional Officer Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Davidson v. Maronte Jr. et al
as 8:2020cv00785
Defendant:
Officer E. Livingston, Corizone Health Services Inc., Visiting Room Officer and others
Plaintiff:
Bryant Davidson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MUSGROVE v. MOORE et al
as 1:2019cv00164
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MOORE, SGT. WHICHARD and OFFICER A. JONES
Plaintiff:
SAQUAN S. MUSGROVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Musgrove v. Moore et al
as 5:2019ct03035
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Moore, Sgt. Whichard and Officer A. Jones
Plaintiff:
Saquan S. Musgrove
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Asbell et al
as 5:2018ct03144
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Defendant:
Thomas E. Asbell, II, Captain Fields, Captain Enzor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Asbell et al
as 5:2018ct03111
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Defendant:
Thomas E. Asbell, II, Captain Johnson, Sgt. Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danet v. Baker et al
as 2:2018cv00251
Plaintiff:
Bruce M. Danet
Defendant:
Officer Baker, Officer Moore and Officer Ashley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
