Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Bradley v. Anderson et al
as 5:2026cv00653
Plaintiff:
James C Bradley, Sr.
Defendant:
Bobby Anderson, Jose Martenza, Hannah Biddle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Outen et al v. MedStar Health, Inc.
as 1:2025cv03365
Plaintiff:
Brittany Outen and Nikia Bryant
Defendant:
MedStar Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts
IN RE: MEDSTAR HEALTH 2025 DATA SECURITY LITIGATION
as 1:2025cv03325
Plaintiff:
Tracy Sanders, Richard Foxwell, Antionette Jones and others
Defendant:
MedStar Health Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Andrews et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company) et al
as 2:2025cv12222
Plaintiff:
Elton Andrews, Mrs. Elton Andrews, Sondai Austin and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company), AGC Chemicals Americas, Allstar Fire Equipment Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Outen v. WellSpan Health et al
as 1:2025cv01566
Defendant:
WellSpan Health, Dr. Muhammed Rashid, Colton Spangler and others
Plaintiff:
Grace Elaine Outen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00135
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Brown v. NaphCare Inc et al
as 4:2024cv05069
Defendant:
Jane Doe LPN #6, Jane Doe LPN #3, Officer San Pedro and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Darnell Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. Marchas Outen
as 24-4011
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARCHAS DONELL OUTEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
