Cases 31 - 40 of 107
Brooks v. San Quentin State Prison, et al
as 5:2016cv05550
Plaintiff:
Charles Anthony Brooks
Defendant:
San Quentin State Prison, CDCR, Ronald Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company
as 3:2016cv05340
Plaintiff:
James P. Baker
Defendant:
Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Gonzales v. Baker
as 9:2016cv00133
Petitioner:
Frank Gonzales
Respondent:
Aaron P Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzales v. Baker
as 4:2016cv02239
Petitioner:
Frank Gonzales
Respondent:
Aaron P Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2015cv02687
Plaintiff:
Stephanie P Baker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
MULDERIG et al v. THE ESTATE OF BRANDON J. BAKER et al
as 1:2015cv04717
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS MULDERIG, SR. and LAURA J. MULDERIG
Defendant:
THE ESTATE OF BRANDON J. BAKER, STEPHEN P. BAKER , NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAKER v. LOUGHMILLER
as 1:2015cv00097
Plaintiff:
JOHN P BAKER
Defendant:
TIMOTHY L LOUGHMILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Collier v. Great Western Insurance Co et al
as 6:2014cv03352
Plaintiff:
Derek Collier
Defendant:
Great Western Insurance Co, Craig P Baker and R D H Trucking Inc
Third_party_defendant:
Mountain Lake Risk Retention Group Inc
Third_party_plaintiff:
R D H Trucking Inc and Craig P Baker
Counter_claimant:
R D H Trucking Inc and Craig P Baker
Counter_defendant:
Derek Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Halmon v. Baker et al
as 1:2014cv05470
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Halmon
Defendant:
Terrance P. Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv20802
Plaintiff:
Clara P. Baker
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
