Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Clervrain et al v. Wahl et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Ronaldo Jean, Brandako, Inc and others
Defendant:
John Wahl, John Skipper, Sallie Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Garcia
as 21-40630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Billy Ray Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
Juan Pena Garcia, Bancorp South Bank and Pat Wilson, Assistant Vice President
Dixon v. Outskirts Press Publishing Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv00729
Defendant:
Leona, Pat Wilson, Brent Sampson and others
Plaintiff:
Landry Dixon
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Johnson v. Garcia et al
as 5:2020cv00137
Defendant:
Juan Pena Garcia, Pat Wilson, BancorpSouth and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILSON v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv00744
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LTD
Plaintiff:
PAT WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Global Tech Industries Group, Inc. et al v. American Resource Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00698
Defendant:
American Resource Technologies, Inc., Hugh Fowler, M.H. McLLvain and others
Plaintiff:
Global Tech Industries Group, Inc. and TTII Oil and Gas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Reed v. Monroe County, Tennessee et al (TV2)
as 3:2013cv00085
Plaintiff:
Steven Gerald Reed
Defendant:
Monroe County, Tennessee , Bill Bivens , Johnny Edward Bates, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv11366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Cook v. Bivens et al
as 3:2007cv00404
Plaintiff:
James W. Cook
Defendant:
Bill Bivens, Larry Lynn, Butch McKonkey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
