Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02684
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1447 Immigration: Review of Denial of Naturalization Application
SUPER 8 WORLDWIDE, INC. v. PATEL
as 2:2026cv08305
Plaintiff:
SUPER 8 WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
TUMAS R. PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Kamardinov v. EDLOW et al
as 1:2026cv24642
Plaintiff:
Monika Kamardinov
Defendant:
JOSEPH B. EDLOW, Eileen Lopez-Tome, TODD BLANCHE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
JACKSON v. PATEL
as 5:2026cv00277
Plaintiff:
DEBRA JACKSON
Defendant:
HIREN PATEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act, et seq
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01860
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
AHER et al v. DEVI MANOR HOME LLC et al
as 2:2026cv08263
Plaintiff:
SANJAY AHER and VAIBHAV SHARAD AHER
Defendant:
DEVI MANOR HOME LLC and HARSHAD PATEL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Cook v. Blanche et al
as 1:2026cv01869
Plaintiff:
Christopher Russell Cook
Defendant:
Todd Blanche, Daniel Driscoll, Kash Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
