Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Municipal Corporation of Burr Ridge, Illinois v. McPartlin
as 1:2023cv06270
Plaintiff:
Municipal Corporation of Burr Ridge, Illinois
Defendant:
Patrick James McPartlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Grider v. City of Auburn Alabama et al
as 3:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
Patrick James Grider
Defendant:
City of Auburn Alabama, Stephanie Johns and Kimberly Costen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Goodwill of the San Francisco Bay, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01327
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Smith
Defendant:
Goodwill of the San Francisco Bay, Inc., Patrick James Porcuna, City and County of San Francisco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv05526
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Murphy v. Aurora Police et al
as 1:2017cv00040
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy
Defendant:
Aurora Police, John Bennett, Thomas P. Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mulero v. Walsh et al
as 3:2015cv01406
Plaintiff:
Bernie Mulero
Defendant:
Patrick James Walsh, Ronald Sheposh, Gary Gifford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Rasmussen et al
as 1:2015cv00062
Plaintiff:
Patrick James, Sr
Defendant:
Cedar Rapids, City of , Grant Rasmussen and Bruce Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brady v. Navajo, County of et al
as 3:2015cv08110
Plaintiff:
Patrick-James Brady
Defendant:
Navajo, County of , Debra Serna , Michael Espino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv01956
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
