Cases 41 - 50 of 799
Petty v. Butler et al
as 1:2023cv00026
Petitioner:
Garon Jaquez Petty and Gavon Jaquez Petty
Respondent:
Michael Wood, Steve Marshall and Reosha Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boyd et al v TDCJ
as 6:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Andre D Boyd, Norris Hicks, Dennis Mayes and others
Defendant:
TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petty v. Scarborough
as 3:2022cv00663
Plaintiff:
Tyler Joseph Petty
Defendant:
J. J. Scarborough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pattison v. Lombardo et al.
as 3:2022cv00537
Plaintiff:
Dante H. Pattison
Defendant:
Sheriff Joe Lombardo, Brian Sandoval, Steve Sisolak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04164
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc., Dr. Alan Weaver, Dr. John Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vessell v. Petty, et al.
as 7:2022cv00578
Plaintiff:
Amanda Vessell
Defendant:
Andy Petty, Rob Coleman, Daniel Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren Paschal, Jr. v. Petty, et al
as 22-13299
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WARREN PASCHAL, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
PETTY and SHERIFF OF MUSCOGEE COUNTY, GEORGIA
Day v. Lancaster et al
as 7:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Shannon Day
Defendant:
Monica Lancaster, Jerry Cook, Matthew Nicholas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SATTERFIELD v. SEIFERT et al
as 1:2022cv00768
Plaintiff:
MARCUS A. SATTERFIELD
Defendant:
OFFICER J. F. SEIFERT, T. J. KNAUB and STEVE PETTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETTIS v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY et al
as 2:2022cv05121
Plaintiff:
JASON PETTIS
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY and MIDDLESEX WATER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
