Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Propes v. PSAN PI/WD Trust et, al.
as 0:2026cv63073
Defendant:
PSAN PI/WD Trust and Page Brothers Associates, INC. doing business as Coral Springs Honda
Plaintiff:
Tabitha Propes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01399
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv40225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv40225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Seoane v. Trump et al
as 1:2026cv00024
Plaintiff:
Donald Carlos Seoane and Donny Long
Defendant:
Robert Alexander Andrade, Nantita Seoane, Donald Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Tosches v. Lawrence et al
as 3:2026cv08181
Plaintiff:
Liliana R Tosches
Defendant:
Gavin B Lawrence, Kevin Lee Straiton, Lake Havasu RV and Boat Rentals LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv05809
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Moen v. SocialChain, Inc., et al.
as 26-3802
Plaintiff:
HARRO MOEN
Defendant:
NICOLAS KOKKALIS, DOES 1-50, CHENGDIAO FAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
