Cases 41 - 50 of 186
JEWELL v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC.
as 2:2021cv04995
Plaintiff:
BRIAN JEWELL
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Prime Care Medical, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00539
Plaintiff:
Matthew Allen Taylor
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical, Inc., Western Regional Jail and West Virginia Dept of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRENKE v. HOWSARE et al
as 3:2021cv00165
Plaintiff:
SHAWN GRENKE
Defendant:
ERIN HOWSARE, DENNIS VOUGHT, VARSHA PANDYA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HISEL v. LAWRENCE COUNTY CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00935
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. HISEL
Defendant:
LAWRENCE COUNTY CORRECTIONS and PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Gregory v. Prime Care Medical Inc.
as 1:2021cv00031
Plaintiff:
Larry T. Gregory, II
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory v. Prime Care Medical, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00029
Plaintiff:
Larry T. Gregory, II
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timmons v. Prime Care Medical, Inc
as 1:2021cv00469
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical, Inc
Plaintiff:
Christopher A Timmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
HISEL v. LAWRENCE COUNTY CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00117
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. HISEL
Defendant:
LAWRENCE COUNTY CORRECTIONS and PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Daniel Warren v. Prime Care Medical Inc, et al
as 20-3561
Defendant:
THOMAS C. CREIGHTON, III, LISA SCHELLER, COUNTY OF LEHIGH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBORAH WILSON, CARL HOFFMAN, JR., REBECCA F. DAVIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL WARREN
Steven Buttolph v. Prime Care Medical Inc, et al
as 20-3591
Defendant / Appellee:
D.O. CARL HOFFMAN, P.A.C. TANYA SCHISLER and PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN C. BUTTOLPH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
