Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Antwon Jones v. Lyssed Pacheco
as 26-5822
Plaintiff:
ANTWON CORNELIUS JONES
Defendant:
OFFICER LYSSED PACHECO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv14248
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv14246
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Washington v. Fang et al
as 1:2026cv02581
Plaintiff:
Leo Washington
Defendant:
Vanessa Fang, Jasmine LeCont McClanahan, Rowan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Washington v. Fang et al
as 3:2026cv01325
Plaintiff:
Leo Washington
Defendant:
Vanessa Fang, Jasmine LeCont Mcclanahan, Rowan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv12201
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Washington v. Fang et al
as 1:2026cv01405
Plaintiff:
Leo Washington
Defendant:
Vanessa Fang, Jasmine LeCont Mcclanahan, Rowan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington v. Fang et al
as 3:2026cv00736
Plaintiff:
Leo Washington
Defendant:
Vanessa Fang, Jasmine LeCount Mcclanahan, Rowan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Washington v. Fang et al
as 1:2026cv00741
Plaintiff:
Leo Washington
Defendant:
Vanessa Fang, Jasmine LeCount Mcclanahan, Rowan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02565
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
