Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Pitts v. Watson et al
as 2:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Defendant:
L Watson, Haywood and Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Jesse Padilla
as 24-1197
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jesse Steven Padilla, also known as Droopy
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Padilla v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 0:2023cv02844
Plaintiff:
Nilton Padilla
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Carlos Padilla v. United States
as 23-2752
Petitioner / Appellant:
Carlos Artemio Padilla
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Shoemaker et al v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00420
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Shoemaker, Andrea L. Arroyo, Benjamin Atwell and others
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc. and T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
In re: T-Mobile 2022 Customer Data Security Breach Litigation
as 4:2023md03073
Plaintiff:
Judith Lynch, Frankie J. Gonzalez, Lisa Frierson and others
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc. and T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Padilla v. Segal
as 0:2023cv01596
Petitioner:
Darlene Lluvia Padilla
Respondent:
Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Padilla v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00151
Petitioner:
Carlos Artemio Padilla
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Clervrain et al v. Fortenberry et al
as 7:2022cv05003
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Wesner Compere
Defendant:
Jeff Fortenberry, Don Bacon, Adrian Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
