Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Lima et al v. Westmoreland Protection Agency, Inc. et al
as 0:2020cv61352
Defendant:
Paul Spence, Westmoreland Protection Agency, Inc., Pam Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Jean Patrick Saintil and Pierre Junior Lima
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Pam Johnson et al v. Albertsons Companies Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03294
Plaintiff:
Michelle Blankenship, Pam Johnson and Kim Johnson
Defendant:
Imerys Talc America, Inc., Whittaker Clark and Daniels, Inc., Does 1 through 400, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Corral v. Warren et al
as 2:2018cv00024
Plaintiff:
Dylan Corral
Defendant:
Warren, Berlier, Bouldin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. King County
as 3:2017cv05862
Plaintiff:
Pam Johnson
Defendant:
King County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2017cv01565
Plaintiff:
Pam Johnson
Defendant:
King County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norman v. Cooper et al
as 4:2017cv00482
Plaintiff:
Chad W Norman
Defendant:
William Cooper, Pam Johnson, Karen Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roxanne Adams, Administrator of the Estate of Jamycheal M. Mitchell v. Naphcare, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00229
Plaintiff:
Roxanne Adams, Administrator of the Estate of Jamycheal M. Mitchell
Defendant:
Naphcare, Inc., Nsekenene Kolongo, MD, Renee Edwards, LCSW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gale v. Annapolis City Police Department et al
as 1:2015cv02803
Plaintiff:
Justin D. Gale
Defendant:
Annapolis City Police Department, City of Annapolis, Anne Arundel County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-16752
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tonkins v. Cowan et al
as 1:2014cv00598
Plaintiff:
Darrell Tonkins
Defendant:
F. Cowan, Pam Johnson and Sayre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
