Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Mcdonald v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11634
Plaintiff:
Pamela Mcdonald
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Henderson v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01126
Plaintiff:
Tauron Henderson
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Kevin J. Ranson, Jasen Bohinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Renner et al v. Gibson
as 3:2021cv00005
Defendant:
Bondy Shay Gibson
Plaintiff:
Tina Renner and Pamela McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. McDonald et al
as 3:2020cv01697
Defendant:
Mr. Kilheeney, Kelly McAndrews, Mary Jo Mather and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick T Ray, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arkels et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11308
Plaintiff:
Bradley Luckhart, Bobby Bolden, Mason Morris and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MCDONALD
as 2:2014cv01315
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
PAMELA MCDONALD
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
McDonald et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2013cv00697
Plaintiff:
Pamela McDonald and Henry McDonald
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McDonald v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv03524
Plaintiff:
Pamela McDonald
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02413
Plaintiff:
Pamela McDonald
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
