Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Strickland v. Demke et al
as 2:2013cv01130
Defendant:
Whitney Vivian Demke, David J. Hardy, Larry S. Jenkins and others
Plaintiff:
Jake M. Strickland
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Davidson v. Taylor
as 4:2013cv00885
Plaintiff:
Harry R. Davidson
Defendant:
Pamela Taylor
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Melongo v. Podlasek et al
as 1:2013cv04924
Plaintiff:
Annabel K Melongo
Defendant:
Robert Podlasek, Julie Gunnigle, Kate O'Hara and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Taylor v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 6:2013cv01036
Plaintiff:
Pamela Taylor
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Taylor v. Zimmer Inc et al
as 1:2012cv09129
Plaintiff:
Pamela Taylor
Defendant:
Zimmer Inc, Zimmer Holdings Inc and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Crawford v. Peikar et al
as 2:2012cv00224
Plaintiff:
Jeffery L Crawford
Defendant:
Nader Peikar, Rivers Graham, Brenda Hoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark Taylor, et al v. Honeywell International, Inc., et al
as 12-17507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK LEE TAYLOR and PAMELA TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. and JEPPESEN SANDERSON, INC.
Taylor v. Zimmer Inc et al
as 2:2012cv05143
Plaintiff:
Pamela Taylor
Defendant:
Zimmer Inc, Zimmer Holdings Inc and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2012cv01895
Plaintiff:
Pamela Taylor
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
TAYLOR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2012cv00894
Plaintiff:
PAMELA TAYLOR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
