Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv06795
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Wood v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv03965
Plaintiff:
Pamela Wood
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jovon Davis v. Keeling
as 17-7009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOVON DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. JAMES BROCKINGTON, JAMES KEELING, Warden, PAMELA WOODS, Unit Manager and others
Defendant:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HAROLD CLARK, Virginia D.O.C Director, LT. TAYLOR and others
Jovon Davis v. VDOC
as 16-6975
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOVON DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HAROLD CLARK, Virginia Department of Corrections Director, JAMES KEELING, Warden and others
Wood v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv04564
Plaintiff:
Pamela Wood
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ferguson v. City of Chicago Park District et al
as 1:2015cv03014
Plaintiff:
Zachary Ferguson
Defendant:
City of Chicago Park District, Bryan Traubert, Avis LaVelle and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
United States v. Pamela Wood
as 14-1531
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Pamela Wood
Woods et al v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01653
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharpe & Dohme Corporation
Plaintiff:
Edward J. Woods and Pamela Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DOTY v. SNYDER et al
as 1:2013cv00060
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DOTY
Defendant:
BARRY SNYDER, DOMINIC DILULLO, DAVID SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00255
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
