Cases 21 - 30 of 177
Ron Bounds v. Donna Byrnes, et al
as 22-35086
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RON BOUNDS
Defendant / Appellee:
DONNA BYRNES, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, KAY HEINRICH, Associate Superintendent, MICHAEL KERR, Counselor - T- Unit and others
Johnnie Jones, Jr. v. Karen Brown
as 21-7649
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNNIE NELL JONES, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
KAREN BROWN, Chairwoman, Virginia Department of Corrections, HAROLD CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, DOE #1, Parole Board Member, in their individual capacity and others
Marchant v. Stephenson et al
as 2:2021cv12807
Plaintiff:
Ian Marchant
Defendant:
George Stephenson, Kristopher Steece and Parole Board Members
McClellan v. Stephenson et al
as 2:2021cv12813
Plaintiff:
Arthur H. McClellan
Defendant:
George Stephenson, Kristopher Steece and Parole Board Member
Sanchez v. Stephenson et al
as 2:2021cv12811
Plaintiff:
Johnny Sanchez
Defendant:
George Stephenson, Kristopher Steece and Parole Board Member
SAMPLE v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2021cv01301
Plaintiff:
AMBROSE J. SAMPLE, II
Defendant:
THEODORE JOHNSON, Hearing Examiner TIMOTHY J. DOUGLASS, Parole Board Member MARK KOSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Smith v. Lumpkin et al
as 3:2021cv00205
Petitioner:
Matthew Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, TX. Board of Pardons & Paroles Div., Huntsville Parole Board Members and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lay v. LA Parole Board
as 21-30283
Defendant / Appellee:
Louisiana Parole Board Members and State of Louisiana
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Richard B. Lay
Miller v. Zieger et al
as 5:2021cv06046
Defendant:
Fields, Nickels, Jessica Zieger and others
Plaintiff:
Shannon Louise Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonio Bridges v. Michigan Parole Board Members, et al
as 20-2224
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO VALLIN BRIDGES
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN PAROLE BOARD, Members and MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Director
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
