Cases 21 - 30 of 154
McClellan v. Stephenson et al
as 2:2021cv12813
Plaintiff:
Arthur H. McClellan
Defendant:
George Stephenson, Kristopher Steece and Parole Board Member
Sanchez v. Stephenson et al
as 2:2021cv12811
Plaintiff:
Johnny Sanchez
Defendant:
George Stephenson, Kristopher Steece and Parole Board Member
SAMPLE v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2021cv01301
Plaintiff:
AMBROSE J. SAMPLE, II
Defendant:
THEODORE JOHNSON, Hearing Examiner TIMOTHY J. DOUGLASS, Parole Board Member MARK KOSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Smith v. Lumpkin et al
as 3:2021cv00205
Petitioner:
Matthew Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, TX. Board of Pardons & Paroles Div., Huntsville Parole Board Members and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Zieger et al
as 5:2021cv06046
Defendant:
Fields, Nickels, Jessica Zieger and others
Plaintiff:
Shannon Louise Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bridges #437651 v. Michigan Parole Board Members et al
as 1:2020cv01138
Plaintiff:
Antonio Vallin Bridges #437651
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board Members and Michigan Department of Corrections Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armant v. Unknown et al
as 3:2020cv00800
Defendant:
Kenneth Loft, Dr. Unknown Singh, Unknown Cautu and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie J. Armant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunnicutt v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2020cv03375
Respondent:
John Doe, Director, TDCJ-CID and Pardons and Paroles Board Members
Petitioner:
Charles Larry Hunnicutt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roberts v. Felts
as 4:2020cv00882
Plaintiff:
Brunson Roberts
Defendant:
John Felts, Solomn Graves and Does John and Jane, Parole Board Members
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lay v. Louisiana Parole Board Members et al
as 3:2020cv00094
Defendant:
Louisiana Parole Board Members, James LeBlanc and W. Sandy McCain
Plaintiff:
Richard B. Lay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
